This is the abstract of a study selected by Drug and Alcohol Findings as particularly relevant to improving outcomes from drug or alcohol interventions in the United Kingdom. It was not published by Drug and Alcohol Findings. Unless permission has been granted, we are unable to supply full text. Click on the Title to visit the publisher's or other document supplier's web site. Other links to source documents also in blue. Hover mouse over orange text for explanatory notes. Free reprints may be available from the authors - click Request reprint to send or adapt the pre-prepared e-mail message. The abstract is normally based on the document's own abstract.
Mazerolle L., Soole D., Rombouts S. Request reprint
Police Quarterly: 2007, 10, p. 115–153.
Abstract This article describes the results of a systematic review of evaluations of the impact of drug law enforcement on drug problems including drug use, dealing, supply, demand, and associated problems in drug dealing areas. The review divides the interventions in to five main categories.
1 International and national interventions such as eradicating crops being grown for drug production and interdicting and seizing drug shipments, neither of which have been shown to be effective.
2 Reactive/directed interventions such as crackdowns, raids, buy-busts, and saturation patrolling. These traditional tactics which respond to problems coming to the attention of the police generally have mixed evidence of effectiveness, in the case of raids, also short-term, and in the case of crackdowns, dependent on the circumstances. Intelligence-led search and seizure targeting domestic manufacturing has been found effective in two US studies.
3 Proactive/partnership interventions initiated on the basis of an analysis of the underlying problem, forming part of a more strategic response involving partnerships with community bodies and local people intended to have a lasting impact. Among these are third-party policing, problem-oriented policing, community policing, changing the physical environment, and drug nuisance abatement. Apart from 'drug-free' zones which exclude drug offenders and cross-jurisdiction task forces, these have some evidence of effectiveness.
4 Interventions targeting identified individuals such as arrest referral of suspects and diverting offenders from prosecution through the use of cautions, both of which have some evidence of effectiveness.
5 Interventions deploying a combination of reactive/directed and proactive/partnership strategies, for which there is some evidence of effectiveness.
The authors concluded that proactive interventions involving partnerships between the police and third parties and/or community entities appear to be more effective at reducing both drug and non-drug problems in areas with drug problems than reactive/directed approaches. However, they cautioned that the general quality of research in drug law enforcement is poor and only a limited range of interventions have been evaluated.
Last revised 21 February 2009
Comment on this entry
Give us your feedback on the site (one-minute survey)
Refocusing drug-related law enforcement to address harms REVIEW 2009
Community solidarity and civil law important tools in reducing drug-related nuisance and crime STUDY 2000
Modern Crime Prevention Strategy DOCUMENT 2016
Drugs: international comparators STUDY 2014
Police crackdowns: environmental and community changes sustain impact STUDY 2002
Drug Strategy 2010. Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting People to Live a Drug Free Life DOCUMENT 2010
Effect of drug law enforcement on drug-related violence: a systematic review REVIEW 2011
Effect of drug law enforcement on drug-related violence: evidence from a scientific review REVIEW 2010
Cracking down on youth tobacco may influence drug use STUDY 2010
Prison Drugs Strategy DOCUMENT 2019